Paris Hilton Autopsy
By Stephanie Nikolopoulos on Saturday, May 12th, 2007
Poor Paris Hilton. Not in the financial sense obviously — the heiress is filthy rich simply by virtue of being born into the right family. Any job she has held has been a rather glamorous one — model, actress, author, purse designer. And she’s not poor so much in the social sense — each time her cell phone’s been hacked, her slew of celebrity friends have been revealed, and of course we always see her dancing on tables at nightclubs that wouldn’t let most of us get beyond the velvet ropes.
Wait — where was I going with this?
Oh yeah, poor Paris. She’s everyone’s favorite celebrity to pick on. People are ruthless about their opinions of her. The latest critic is Daniel Edwards, whose Paris Hilton Autopsy is currently on display at Capla Kesting Fine Art (121 Roebling Street, Brooklyn).
The sculpture of the socialite is reportedly meant to teach teens about the dangers of drinking and driving. Just a few days ago — May 4, to be exact — Hilton was sentenced to jail for drunk driving. Well, sort of. It was more that she had been speeding without her headlights on when she wasn’t even supposed to be driving at all because in September 2006 she’d been caught driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08. And, she never signed up for a mandatory alcohol-education program.
If Edwards’ art had imagined Paris Hilton as a crashtest dummy, it would’ve gotten the point across with layered meanings: don’t drink and drive and Paris is a dummy. If Edwards made the beautiful Paris Hilton gory from a car crash, that too would’ve driven the message home that even pretty girls aren’t safe from the dangers of alcohol.
Edwards’ Paris Hilton Autopsy is not the public service announcement it claims to be, though. He has created a sexually explicit sculpture of a naked Paris Hilton. You can take her innards out, and if you do, you will discover two fetuses. This is an attack on Hilton’s sexuality. Granted, Hilton has been caught in one too many sex-tape scandals, but that has nothing to do with drunk driving.
The Paris Hilton Autopsy “includes support material from Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD),” and it is clear that the exhibit seeks to scare teens out of sex, as well as drinking. The press release for Paris Hilton Autopsy “observes the teen pregnancy crisis associated with alcohol impaired judgment,” but the truth of the matter is, Paris Hilton was not a teenager when she was charged with DUI nor when she was rumored to be pregnant, which was later reported as false anyway.
What is a fact, is that Daniel Edwards’ depictions of famous female celebrities have stirred up controversy in the past. Last year around this time, Hilton’s friend Britney Spears was the subject of Edwards’ work. Like Hilton, Spears was depicted nude, with child, and in a sexual position. The sculpture was called Monument to Pro-Life, and the artist said, “Britney provides inspiration for those struggling with the ‘right choice.’” Meanwhile, Edwards also made a bust of Hillary Clinton, in which he portrayed her in a low-cut dress, downplaying her political achivements by staring at her boobs. By sexualizing these blondes, Edwards in fact degrades women.
There is no humanity in this piece. It merely capitalizes on making fun of someone. Whatever message Edwards had toward promoting abstinence of alcohol and sex through the Paris Hilton Autopsy will be lost on immature teen boys who will gawk at the almost-still-beautiful naked body. Young women, on the other hand, will once again see that even in their death they are little more than an objectified body.


del.icio.us
Digg it
May 12th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
wonderfully written review. I think I now love you.
May 13th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
no comment…the article says it all
May 14th, 2007 at 11:57 am
Umm. Do any New York City teen even drive sober? Maybe the hipste teens of williamsburg will be scared straight and not drive drunk
May 16th, 2007 at 12:14 am
Wow. The sarcasm of this work has noodled you into a very weird corner–declaring Paris as a feminist victim? Really?
May 16th, 2007 at 7:57 am
Sure, why not? I am by no means saying that Paris Hilton is a role model — but my job isn’t to critique her, it’s to critique the art. The artist claims that his objective is to teach teens about the dangers of drunk driving. Given Hilton’s DUI, I think it’s fair game to use her to show that even celebrities who seemingly have it all can get arrested. However, I was rather disturbed to find an artwork so sexually explicit aimed at teenagers, given that the supposed point of the piece was drunk driving not promiscuity. I think it capitalizes on shock value, and that it won’t have any influence over whether kids drink before prom or not — particularly since the exhibit is here in New York City, where most adults don’t even drive.
May 24th, 2007 at 11:54 am
i agree, what does Hilton’s sexuality have to do with her DUI charge….perhaps the artist’s exposure? which is more revealing, the art or the artist’s intentions?
November 5th, 2007 at 12:51 am
Yadi yadi she is cool and i’am working on her on famouse profile and we are doing magazine i’m working on ! i’m working on her! HOOORAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
February 8th, 2008 at 7:54 am
I have been visiting this site a lot lately, so i thought it is a good idea to show my appreciation with a comment.
Thanks,
Jim Mirkalami
PS: I am a single dad!
July 7th, 2008 at 8:42 am
xnogcd sqtujikmf lpesr oehzsftd imwoyn fqxptwh cupoixkns